On 17.05.2012 01:19, [email protected] wrote: > Author: greg.ercolano > Date: 2012-05-16 16:19:37 -0700 (Wed, 16 May 2012) > New Revision: 9510 > Log: > Added three methods and dox to Fl_Tooltip: > > margin_width() -- controls margins around tooltip's text > margin_height() -- controls margins above and below tooltip's text > wrap_width() -- controls maximum width of text before wordwrapping > is enforced > > These are read-only for the current release, > and read/write as an ABI feature.
Greg, on the first glance these methods all seem to be static, and according to [1] adding static data members to a class wouldn't break the ABI (adding static methods shouldn't either, IMHO). If that's true, we could probably drop the ABI feature macro and make all new methods available... Thoughts? Albrecht [1] <http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C++> _______________________________________________ fltk-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk-dev
