> I wanted to suggest an update of docs for some classes in 1.1 when I noticed > a weird thing. Sometimes protected methods are listed in docs (and sometimes > not) and there is no notice that the method is protected? If outside user of > this class tries to use such method, they will get an error. Meanwhile, > having protected methods in docs is useful for people that want to subclass > (which is a very popular thing with fltk)... > > What is the policy for fltk documentation? I would suggest creating a > separate list of protected methods in documentation of each class. This would > require going through the whole fltk docs and fixing a lot of stuff... any > plans for doxygen use in fltk1? :)
AFAIK, there is already branch Matt created for doxygen documentation which will be presumably finalized for 1.2 (or next version after 1.1.8 :)) Doxygen nicely solves theese problems adding "[protected]" to those members which are. -- Sanel _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
