On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 05:14:11 -0700
Coda Lyzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Boost is a great library available for all possible platforms. Why not add 
> its support to FLTK. I mean its signals facility. It can be much cleaner and 
> nicer than current callbacks mechanism. Also I think  there should be some 
> use of Boost's shareptr and may be some other nice features.
> Currently FLTK looks more like "trying to be C++", it doesn't use many 
> advanced C++ feature available on most compilers since the beginning of this 
> millenium.
> 
> I'd like to know what do you people think about it.
> 
> Thanks for your attention guys.
        L in FLTK is for light. Boost isn't light, so, maybe that's the reason.

-- 
FreeB(eer)S(ex)D(drugs) are the real daemons
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk

Reply via email to