> > In C, literal strings are implied to be 'const' because they are > stored in memory marked read-only. Most compilers don't give an error > because requiring the 'const' would break millions of lines of old > Unix code. > > Nevertheless, the "const" should be there. Please file and STR at > > http://www.fltk.org/str.php >
Well, since there are no literal strings in the posted code, I don't think that's the issue. I seem to recall a C library issue (the details of which I forget) having to do with whether functions like strrchr return a char* or a const char*. Seems like the return value should be const, but I think some C library implementations return non-const. _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
