On 29 Mar 2008, at 8:04, matthiasm wrote: > I am in the process of > comparing the current 1.1.8 UTF-8 patch, Oksid's 1.1.6 patch, and > whatever we did in 2.0 to find the best possible API and then merge it > all together.
Does this review also encompass my patched 1.1.8 version? That should be closer to the "real" 1.1.8 than OksiD's code, and has some "improvements" that I added. I also back-ported some of the fltk-2 changes in to the fltk-1 variant. IIRC, I also excised a fair bit of win32 legacy support code, that OksiD had added to support win9x style systems - I assumed that is no longer needed? I can't comment on whether the fltk-1 or fltk-2 utf8 code is "best", though. I'm not able to make that call objectively. Cheers - hope it makes some sort of sense. It needs this independent review, I reckon! -- Ian _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
