Michael Sweet wrote: r... > > You can always define new box types using the fl_up_box and > fl_down_box functions.
Yes, I could also probably use a trick like Fl::set_boxtype(FL_FREE_BOXTYPE+FL_DOWN_BOX, FL_DOWN_BOX); Fl::set_boxtype(FL_FREE_BOXTYPE+FL_THIN_DOWN_BOX, FL_THIN_DOWN_BOX); before scheme applying and then use these after scheme applied. > > That said, it might be useful in 1.3 to provide "FL_DEFAULT_*" > enumerations that get assigned when Fl::scheme() is called with Yes, maybe for backward compatibility reasons and to avoid confusion it would be better to leave the schemeable names as FL_DOWN_BOX etc without any prefix and make the original versions with names something like FL_CLASIC_DOWN_BOX etc. I have send a few thoughts about boxtypes, highlighting and scheming to f.development newsgroup, I will appreciate any comments. Thank you. Roman _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
