> > If the insert/remove capabilities need to be extended to support the > > tree_widget, would it be worthwhile to put those extensions into > > Fl_Group, so that it, and other derived widgets, might also get the > > benefits? > Definitely, as some new flags and enumerations could benefits as well > in other widgets functionalities hopefully without redundancy. >
While the hood is up, how about implementing these as O(log(n)) operations? Especially considering the proposal that widget geometry is going to be stored as ints, in order to accomodate more group members. Best, Stan _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
