> Yuri D'Elia wrote: > I don't have much experience using Win32, but I don't think there are > other solutions. Unless you can use the "wParam" "lParam" parameters > in some way that makes sense (like sending a cast-ed pointer to your > real data, or shared object). > > I would look into other forms of communication (like sockets, IPC of some > other nature) if you have control over the dll.
Indeed, it could be a solution. But I should replanned the whole way of communication between the dll and the app and I really don't know much about sockets etc... But don't you think that the user function required by add_handler has a little conception pb ? void Fl::add_handler(int (*f)(int)) since that function will inevitably be static, I think a void userdata pointer would be very appreciable. void Fl::add_handler(int (*f)(int, void*)) In that way user could retrieve his datas and do something with that function. Could such prototype be implemented in a futur release of FLTK or is there a good reason to don't do so ? _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
