Evan Laforge wrote: > Allow me to vent a little: > > BTW, is it just me, or is the fltk src really hard to read?
I have to agree and I've spent *decades* reading/writing/maintaining C code, including the X11R6 server and Xlib [1]. I actually filed an enhancement request for some cleanup. > No offense intended to the author of course. Very true - I'm grateful FLTK exists and is useful. I just wish I had no reason to have to read the code. > Is there any interest in general code quality cleanup? This seems like such a religious issue but a style guideline would be useful for community code, especially for us ancients for whom IDE means emacs. > Like most people, I can't promise time ... Ditto, but seeing as the only likelihood of seeing the bugs I find getting fixed, I've been tempted. Craig [1] The X server code is actually pretty good, just patting myself on the back. Not that I remember any of it ... _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
