imacarthur wrote:
>> b8 ae e5 8a a9 39 20 e9 80 80 e5 87 ba ff
>
> I assume the 0xFF at the end is just a typo? (It is not valid UTF-8)
> Replacing that with 0x00 seems to form a valid UTF-8 string, and in
> my tests it seems to work just fine. I don't seem to see the effects
> you report.
Good catch; if that's the problem, an invalid UTF8 string,
that could cause the mess as well I suppose, in which case
modify the code I sent you accordingly, as it's based on the
hex you sent me, which has the \xff in it.
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
