On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote:

> Yes - although I got caught out by Rosetta on at least one occasion. The
> code ran OK on an intel box, but actually was a thin PPC binary...

I'll keep in mind that that can happen.

  In this case though, I think the universal binary thing worked:
During compiling I got a few duplicate warnings (once for intel,
once for PPC). Also, when running the program (on Intel), it
proceeded to try to load additional plugin libraries (which
I had not yet provided as universal binary).

It complained that although the libraries were there, they did
not support the current (intel) architecture.

So it seems building the universal binary (save the plugins)
worked as intended. I guess I'll sit down tonight and get those
libraries compiled for mixed architecture as well.

Best,
Marc

_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk

Reply via email to