> Fabien Costantini wrote: > >> Greg Ercolano wrote: > >>>> Duncan Gibson wrote: > >>>>>>> SORT_BRIEF_DOCS = NO > >>>>>> Looks like this is what we want to set to YES. I did a short test, > >>>>>> and IMHO it looks good. > >>> Yeah, just tried it here too.. nice. > >>> Stuff I've been working on looks a whole lot better. > >>> > >>> Don't have to keep doing ^F now in the browser to find things..! > >> Okay, seems we have 3 positive votes, and since it's such a minor > >> change I'm going to check this in. > >> > >> Let's see later if anybody complains ;-) > >> > >> Albrecht > > I do complain :-) > > okay, complaint registered ;-) > > > This was made on purpose and we even (briefly) discussed about this, > > this was made to follow the API order in the sources. > > > Because we thought that you want to consider the most important API first, > > we (at least matt and me originally I think) liked the API to follow code > > order in the source. > > These are not a developer docs, and end users won't know what we > consider most important (if the sources are ordered by importance at > all). Please have a closer look (and maybe also at the previous version) > and think about it again ...
I had a closer look probably a long time before you start to think about it (this week?) Especially because end users don't know about what it is important, it is important to put the most important material first. Anyway, it seems a majority wants this thing sorted, as for now. > > And let's see what Matthias says. Sure, and other team mates too. > ./.. > Albrecht Fabien _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
