> > A lot of this has been enhanced in later variants, and the 1.1.7 version
> > is "outdated" now. I honestly thnk you would get some benefit from
> > moving to 1.1.9, or the 1.1.10 svn (despite your earlier reservations)
> > as I do believe this mechanism has been improved.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion.  Upgrading would be my inclination as well, but 
> our project is currently in the "if it's not broken, don't fix it" mode.  So 
> given that we don't have any FLTK-related problems that we know of, we're 
> probably going to stick with 1.1.7 for now.

Wait, I may have missed the point you were making.  When you say, "... I do 
believe this mechanism has been improved.", could you be more specific?
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk

Reply via email to