Thanks for the help. Yes, these two seem to work fine.
I had been hoping to start out with FLTK 2 to avoid porting later when
FLTK 2 does become the stable branch. But, if most of the development is
happening on the 1.x branch, maybe I should stick tothat instead.
Albrecht Schlosser wrote:
> Albrecht Schlosser wrote:
>
>
>> I rewrote your example for FLTK 1.3, and there's no problem with it:
>>
>
> Here's another improved version. FLTK 1.1 looks much better,
> if you use show(argc,argv) (and Fl::scheme("gtk+");).
>
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
