pawel wrote: > Hi, > Though I may be ignorant, I am in fact very much liking my discovery of FLTK. > That being the context, I can't see any explicit statement as to why there > are TWO ongoing concurrent developments, ie, 1.3 and 2.0. > Many thanks.
Pawel, FLTK v2 went into a different direction - direction some of us like/prefer more than FLTK v1. I prefer nice/clean fltk namespace instead of Fl_ and fl_ prefixes to classes/functions. I also like FLTK 2 way of dealing with styles - I think it is an amazing idea, kudos to Bill. However, FLTK 1 is no doubt more stable and has bright future. Both are still FLTK, and it is not that difficult to port FLTK v1 applications to FLTK v2 and vice versa. :) Kind regards _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
