> Ian:
> > But in the context of a threaded app, a call to Fl::awake() will
> > cause the fltk loop to do its thing. Since it is not possible to
> > call Fl::flush() from a subsidiary thread, Fl::awake() is the best
> > (and only, really) substitute.

> > Despite what the docs show, Fl::awake() with no args is a perfectly
> > valid option. Indeed the original version of Fl::awake() had no
> > args, they got added later. In this context (as a stand in for
> > Fl::flush()...) they are not needed.

Me:
> Thank you Ian, I stand corrected.
> I shall add your text to the docs.

Done. See revision 6787

_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk

Reply via email to