Ouch... Is there anyway to use a function in a while instead of Fl::run(); For my application it will be more suited, because I have to make other computation, absolutely not related to FLTK. And I don't want to make this computation periodically but all the time. And only refresh FLTK from time to time and when needed.
> If your intention is a continuous redraw (animation, for example), you > should still use Fl::run() and prepend a call to Fl::add_timeout(). In the > timout, you call redraw(), and Fl::repeat_timeout() But the redraw() should be called only to the main window, right? thanks, Loic, > Am 29.05.2009 15:39 Uhr schrieb "Loic" unter <[email protected]>: > > int main (int argc, char *argv[]) > > { > > Well, you have the right idea, but a little confusion in where the commands > go. > > > WIN_MAIN* test = new WIN_MAIN(0,0,800,600,"Test Window"); > > test->resizable(test); > > test->show(); > > > > while(test->shown()){ > ^^ this is not needed. FLTK quits the app when the last window is closed > > > Fl::check(); > ^^ this is not needed, because it does not do what you want. It handles > events, but no drawing. > > > //test->damage(FL_DAMAGE_ALL); > > test->redraw(); > ^^ this also does not do what you want. This call merely marks your window > for drawing "at the next occasion". None of your calls give FLTK the > occasion to draw anything. The correct call would be Fl::flush() > > > } > ^^ so to put it al into a single call, all you need to do is: > > Fl::run(); > > Instead of the entir "while" loop. > > > return 0; > > } > > If your intention is a continuous redraw (animation, for example), you > should still use Fl::run() and prepend a call to Fl::add_timeout(). In the > timout, you call redraw(), and Fl::repeat_timeout() > > > _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
