Edi wrote: > >> Also note that fltk-2 is not actively maintained, so it is unlikely ever >> to be "fixed". You might be better off with fltk-1.1 or fltk-1.3. >> > > Does that mean fltk-2 will be no longer developed? I'm using fltk-e because I > think that the API is much better than fltk-1.1.
There's no *official* statment (yet?), but it appears that there is currently no active maintainer, there are only sporadic checkins (mostly special/new features that someone needs) since more than a year now, and the latest fixes have all been done by flkt-1 maintainers. No one seems to be interested in fixing fltk-2 bugs for years now :-( OTOH, if we could find maintainers who are using fltk-2 and are interested in fixing the bugs ... Albrecht _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
