MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote:
>> FLTK 3 with FLTK 2 API, 1.3 innards, and a 1.3 compatibility layer?
>
> Yes please!
>
> Maybe freeze 1.3 first though...
Indeed.. anyone have an ETA or list of important "what's left"?
I'd probably be more motivated to assist fixing little niggly
things if I knew it would help get 1.3 to meet some arbitrary
freeze deadline.
I suppose we need to first declare a freeze on adding new stuff,
so that we can have a 'fixes only' session where we can all descend
on chopping away at the remaining STRs
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
