Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote:
> Don't be fooled by it's opnion about K&R, he presents an interesting point  
> of view in his book.
> Be brave an accept hear things that you don't like at first, judje after  
> hear the whol history.

        Yes, I did continue past it ;) I was being semi-tongue in cheek.
        But the guy is a heathen for the K&R comment. ;) ;) <-- note smilies

        He also worked for Microsoft (from '87-'95).
        I'd almost dismiss him just for that, but being he worked on the
        memory subsystem, kernel debugger, and the object-oriented windows
        shell (monad?), I can't really fault those.

        But if he'd said he worked on DOS or the Windows API,
        I'd have stopped reading and never ever looked back.

        Seems the more interesting part of his online book is the stuff
        at the end. Haven't read those fully yet, been too busy. But
        a lot of stuff in the intro put me off. The C ghetto and all that
        about kernels should use C++. Rubs me the wrong way :/

        Veering back on topic: books I've read that I've liked that cover
        the strengths and gotchyas of C++ (these are NOT free however):

                "C++ FAQS" (Cline/Lomow)
                "Modern C++ Design" (Alexandrescu)
                "Effective C++" and "More Effective C++" (Meyers)

        Pretty much anything by Meyers and Alexandrescu are excellent.

        The C++ FAQ book is a frigging amazing concentration of knowledge
        from all of the C++ language Usenet newsgroups over the years.
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk

Reply via email to