John Hoare wrote:
> Perhaps maybe it would be better to follow Greg Ercolano's suggestion,
> and fork() off another binary that handles the videoStream(), and
> communicates to it through a pipe.
Do you need a pipe? If the data is coming from a device,
maybe the main program can pass the (separate) video program
the name of the device to read so it can get the data itself.
This would keep things modular, and allow even a script to
monitor the robot's data.
Otherwise, yes, a pipe could work. Shared memory might be
another option.
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
