> I use Crypto++ rather than OpenSSL on Windows/mingw/msys. It > has all the > features of OpenSSL.
Does it? I've only ever toyed with either, but ISTR that OpenSSL had crypto libs and implementations of SSL and TLS, whilst Crypto++ only seemed to have the "bare" crypto libs... Leaving you with some work to make the higher layers hang together. But as I say, I know not... > It complies and can link statically. In many ways, > Crypto++ is a lot like FLTK... very portable and easy to use. I certainly had no problems building Crypto++ with mingw, it just worked OOTB. OpenSSL, I can't remember, I think it worked - they claim to support mingw in their install.w32 file, though you do need NASM and a working Perl too, it would appear. This box has neither, so I can't confirm that! Oh, I (partially) recant that, I do have a working Perl on this box after all! Well, there you go, must have installed that then forgotten! No NASM though. _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
