On 23.01.2011 22:38, Ian MacArthur wrote: >> These options should be preferred over "-static", because -static >> would link everything else also statically. I wouldn't mind much, >> because I believe that in the Windows world there are only dll's >> anyway (no static libs, at least for the Windows runtime), but it >> is surely better to use these two options explicitly if you need >> them. > > So, for my usage, if I use gcc-4.5.x the -static-libgcc (and probably > also -static-libstdc++) options would more or less put me back to where > I am when I use gcc-3.4.5 or similar, then, I guess?
That's what I believe, but I don't *know*. I'm only reading docs, and some informations are from the Cygwin and MinGW mailing lists... Albrecht _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
