On 10.07.2011, at 23:25, Ian MacArthur wrote: > This seems like the best bet *to me*, though we might get away with a less > complete fltk2 compatibility layer, since the fltk2 API moved around a bit > anyway, and it *seems to me* (probably wrongly) to have less of an installed > base. > Though the dillo people, Nuke, cinepaint, et al might take issue with that...
Actually, AFAIK dillo went FLTK1, Nuke went Qt when The Foundry bought it, and Cinepaint's last release was in April 2008, plus it uses a private branch of F2. Are there any other major FLTK2 applications out there? I see ViZiGO (last release in 2005), Gnash uses (used?) FLTK as a frontend option, - Matthias _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
