> I'd have thought the "easy" case for the compiler is just to treat all > these implicit double-to-float conversions as worthy of comment, but > here it is clearly only warning about the case where there will be some > (additional) loss of precision.
Ian, there was _no_ loss of precision in cases 0.5, 0.25. Because these numbers can be represented as exact values even in single float format. -- Best Regards Nikita Egorov _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
