On 25 Mar 2012, at 06:50, David FLEURY wrote:
>
> Hum, the code is from Fl_win32.cxx, the function is :
> Fl_X* Fl_X::make(Fl_Window* w) and try to access a protected enum.
>
> Under VS, I don't see any link between Fl_X and Fl_Widget.
>
> The filename is Fl_win32.cxx this is probably why it not complains under
> Linux. It's not compiling at all.
Yeah, I get that; except that my mingw build seemed to be OK. I guess that
maybe the gcc-derived mingw handles the visibility of enums differently or
something? FWIW, the mingw I have is from gcc 3.4.something, so not the latest
deal (I think mingw current is 4.5 or so...)
>>>
>>> Second (a lot of)
>>> FL/Fl_Window.H(55): error C2487: 'no_fullscreen_y' : member of dll
>>> interface class may not be declared with dll interface
>>> FL/Fl_Window.H(55): error C2487: 'no_fullscreen_w' : member of dll
>>> interface class may not be declared with dll interface
>>> FL/Fl_Window.H(55): error C2487: 'no_fullscreen_h' : member of dll
>>> interface class may not be declared with dll interface
>>>
>>> I think VS applies 'static' attribute only to first variable from list
>>> ('no_fullscreen_x').
>>
>> Ah, that really is odd - that just outright looks like a compiler bug to me,
>> then.
>>
>> Or am I missing something here too?
>
> Same for me. Too early to find another reason. I will check later.
Just for the record, in case anyone got the wrong idea from my posts, I'm not
opposed to the patch in any way; it all seems quite reasonable changes (i.e.
the Fl_Window.H change is effectively NULL, and I don't *think* there's any
harm in the Fl_Widget.H change, though I'm not sure about that...)
It's just that it all seemed a little odd...
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk