> Just in case anyone fancies playing along at home, and did not see the > original posts in the STR, here's the version of the test code I'm > currently using, based on the OP's post but tweaked to build on my system, > and a small Makefile to build it with...
Just for kicks'n'giggles I ported the code to WinXP using the QueryPerformanceCounter() API to get timings, and I get... $ ./qix New control cost 0.02(ms) Show window cost 20.73(ms) ian.macarthur@DESDAF599172 /d/examples/qix-win-times $ ./qix New control cost 0.02(ms) Show window cost 21.61(ms) ian.macarthur@DESDAF599172 /d/examples/qix-win-times $ ./qix New control cost 0.02(ms) Show window cost 20.53(ms) ian.macarthur@DESDAF599172 /d/examples/qix-win-times $ ./qix New control cost 0.02(ms) Show window cost 21.23(ms) ian.macarthur@DESDAF599172 /d/examples/qix-win-times $ ./qix New control cost 0.03(ms) Show window cost 22.45(ms) Which is absolutely irrelevant to the OP's question, but is interesting in so far as it shows similar times to what David reported for his "good" machine under Linux. So maybe that's about the "right" time for current(ish) hardware...? (Though the XP box I'm testing on is not really all that current...!) SELEX Galileo Ltd Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex SS14 3EL A company registered in England & Wales. Company no. 02426132 ******************************************************************** This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute its contents to any other person. ******************************************************************** _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
