On 02.01.2013, at 23:08, Ian MacArthur <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 2 Jan 2013, at 18:50, Greg Ercolano wrote:
>
>> o Don't call Fl::wait(), Fl::flush() or any related methods that will
>> handle system messages
>>
>> ..which I take to mean Fl::run() as being 'related'.
>>
>> Perhaps, though, the list should explicitly mention Fl::run(),
>> as it's the most common thing to call.
>>
>> Devs: shouldn't we add Fl::run() to that short list?
>
> I'd vote yes, though we probably need someone who really understands that
> code (Matthias?) to pitch in with an opinion...
Yes, absolutely. Fl::run() is basically: for(;;) { Fl::wait(); }
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
