Looks really good Paul. I haven't had the opportunity to have a deep dig, but from what I've read in the changelog and your blog post, I think this is definitely the direction we need to be heading. The separate model will help shield the fluent API from changes in the NHibernate XML, and just keeps the whole thing more solid. I'm sure you've got quite a bit to do yet, but if and when the time comes I'll be willing to lend a hand (as I'm sure the other devs will be too).
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Paul Batum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Today I checked in my current progress on a fluent nhibernate rewrite. I > wrote a blog post with more information: > http://www.paulbatum.com/2008/12/fluent-nhibernate-rewrite.html > > You can view the commit log here: > http://code.google.com/p/fluent-nhibernate/source/detail?r=143 > > The branch is here: > http://fluent-nhibernate.googlecode.com/svn/branches/pb-rewrite > > This shouldn't mean much for Fluent NHibernate users at the moment, as it > is nowhere near being as functional as the trunk. However I would really > like some feedback from the Fluent NHibernate devs. Does it look like it is > worth pursuing further? Can you imagine us switching to it eventually? Did I > miss Chad's point > <http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate/msg/57f151b4c047eab5?hl=en>completely > and am doing it all wrong? Comments and criticisms all welcome. > > Thanks, > > Paul Batum > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
