VB does have lambda statements, just not lambda blocks. Which means you are
able to use the property mappings, just not the more complex ones.
Until VB supports lambda blocks, we don't support VB.
However, if you really want to use FNH with VB, and you're willing to put up
with a bit of ugliness you can use the traditional VB delegate style:
Public Class Customer
Private _id As Integer
Public Property Id() As Integer
Get
Return _id
End Get
Set(ByVal value As Integer)
_id = value
End Set
End Property
Private _address As Address
Public Property Address() As Address
Get
Return _address
End Get
Set(ByVal value As Address)
_address = value
End Set
End Property
End Class
Public Class Address
Private _street As String
Public Property Street() As String
Get
Return _street
End Get
Set(ByVal value As String)
_street = value
End Set
End Property
End Class
Public Class CustomerMap
Inherits ClassMap(Of Customer)
Public Sub New()
Id(Function(x) x.Id)
Component(Of Address)(Function(x) x.Address, AddressOf
AddressComponent)
End Sub
Private Sub AddressComponent(ByVal c As ComponentPart(Of Address))
c.Map(Function(x) x.Street)
End Sub
End Class
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Benjamin Geiger <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> Due to managerial fiat, I am forced to write in VB.NET. VB.NET does
> not have lambda statements (as of VS 2008).
>
> Many examples of FNH mappings seem to require lambda statements
> (particularly when involving components). Is there an alternate
> syntax for these, suitable for use in VB.NET?
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
