Sorry for my bad English, that confused you.
I have two reasons here.
1. ExposeConfiguration method can't be called many times. It's an
delegate , not a list that contains delegates. If I call this method
many times, only the last one will be executed. Because I have some
plugins for nh initialization, I don't know how many are them at
runtime, so I can't mix them in one method. I think that
ExposeConfiguration supports many calls will be very helpful. The
codes may looks like below.
private IList<Action<Configuration>> configAlterations = new
List<Action<Configuration>>();
public FluentConfiguration ExposeConfiguration(Action<Configuration> config)
{
if(config != null)
configAlterations.Add(config);
return this;
}
public ISessionFactory BuildSessionFactory()
{
try
{
mappingCfg.Apply(Configuration);
foreach (var configAlteration in configAlterations )
configAlteration(Configuration);
return Configuration.BuildSessionFactory();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
throw CreateConfigurationException(ex);
}
}
2. Yes, I want to use the Configuration object later. The James's
patch solved my problem. thank you.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:00 PM, James Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Calm it Kermit. I'm not against having a constructor overload, I'll do
> that next time I'm in there.
>
> As for exposing the property, I'd prefer not to because it's polluting
> the API, but I'm not that fussed. All I wanted to know was why he said
> he couldn't use the ExposeConfiguration; not didn't want to, or felt
> it was unintuitive, but can't use it.
>
> On 2/17/09, Paul Batum <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Just wanted to add that I recognise you can get a reference to it using
>> Tuna's trick with the closure but I think its highly unintuitive.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Paul Batum <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> James, is there a reason you don't want to expose the Configuration? What
>>> if someone wants to do something with it after the session factory is
>>> built?
>>> It seems perfectly reasonable to me for the getter to be public.
>>>
>>> Also, I wanted to add an overload to Fluently.Configure that takes an
>>> existing Configuration object, there was one user that said this would
>>> make
>>> life much easier for him. Do you have a problem with this?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:23 PM, James Gregory
>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why can't you use the ExposeConfiguration method? Some explanation would
>>>> help.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Karron Qiu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Tuna Toksoz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> > Configuration cfg;
>>>>> > var fconfig=Fluently.Configure().ExposeConfiguration(x =>
>>>>> cfg =
>>>>> > x);
>>>>> > PlayWithCfgHere
>>>>> > var sf = fconfig.BuildSessionFactory();
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Or simple call ExposeConfiguration(Action<NHConfig>) to
>>>>> modify/dowhatever
>>>>> > using a delegate.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Tuna Toksöz
>>>>> > http://tunatoksoz.com
>>>>> > http://turkiyealt.net
>>>>> > http://twitter.com/tehlike
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Typos included to enhance the readers attention!
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Karron Qiu <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> I just want to get the Configuration object from
>>>>> >> Fluently.Configure().
>>>>> >> Or can I pass a Configuration object to Fluently.Configure() ?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Thanks
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Tuna Toksoz <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >> > Fluently.Configure()
>>>>> >> > .Database(/* your database settings */)
>>>>> >> > .Mappings(/* your mappings */)
>>>>> >> > .ExposeConfiguration(/* alter Configuration */) // optional
>>>>> >> > .BuildSessionFactory();
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > says the post on James blog?
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Tuna Toksöz
>>>>> >> > http://tunatoksoz.com
>>>>> >> > http://turkiyealt.net
>>>>> >> > http://twitter.com/tehlike
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Typos included to enhance the readers attention!
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Karron Qiu <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> There is a property in FluentConfiguration, but it is internal...
>>>>> I
>>>>> >> >> want to hold the Configuration in my application because of some
>>>>> >> >> reasons. I can't use the ExposeConfiguration method.
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> --
>>>>> >> >> Regards,
>>>>> >> >> Karron
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> --
>>>>> >> Regards,
>>>>> >> Karron
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Karron
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> >
>>
>
> >
>
--
Regards,
Karron
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
