It should still work. On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:14 PM, ComradeF <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I tried the first approach and I didn't see any new index the affected > table. Is it possible that this no longer works after the recent > conventions rewrite? > > In a way, I was sort of expecting/hoping to see something along the > lines of > > Map(x => x.Name) > .Index(); > > > > On Mar 4, 10:42 am, todd brooks <[email protected]> wrote: > > Just an answer to my own question, in case anyone else runs into > > this. > > > > It was answered on StackOverflow: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/607935/generate-table-indexes-usin... > > > > todd > > > > On Feb 28, 2:28 pm, todd brooks <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > James, > > > > > You had a post back in Sept. 2008 stating thatindexcreation in the > > > fluent mapping had not yet been implemented but you had added an issue > > > for it. > > > > > Has it been implemented yet? I do not see a way to create anindexon > > > a specific mapping, so if it is implemented, can someone point me in > > > the general direction? > > > > > If it hasn't been implemented, is there a reason why? Is it a > > > technical limitation or just low on the priorities list? > > > > > I would like to have my CI process completely generate the database > > > from scratch without me having to run additional post-build scripts. > > > > > Regards, > > > > > todd > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
