Right now, the conventions and I believe the automapping stuff is all based on interfaces. The interfaces are unfortunately a bit behind the curve versus the concrete class definitions. i.e. the concretes have 100% of the object functionality, while the interface may only have 40-60%. That's one of the things that we need to be more consistent with. As we clean those up, you'll see methods become available to you. Specifying FK constraints through the interface is top on my list :) .
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:46 AM, MaggiePlusPlus <[email protected]>wrote: > > Do you mean the constraint name created in the schema? I also would > like to know how to do this. I have a convention to name the FK but > need a way to do the relationship. > > On Apr 28, 7:21 am, liam <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is there a way to specify the name of foreign keys when using > > automapping? I mean the foreign key, not the foreign key column. I > > want the foreign keys to be generated with predictable names instead > > of the random ones. > > > > Thanks, > > Liam. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
