agreed... On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Kasper22 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > @Greg - I based my example on having not seen any use of attributes in > the documentation or in the src. I completely agree with your idea, > attributes would be more straight forward. > > @James - That's a bummer. Luckily I only have one property that needs > to be ignored at this point so it's not an issue for me. > > I would like to see something like an Ignore attribute, because I > think ignoring would be less common than marking properties as > persisted. Which if I had to mark 90% with an attribute of include, > then I would feel like I was doing a lot of extra work. I'm thinking > like XmlSerializer where you can use XmlIgnore. > > On Jul 29, 3:20 pm, James Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > You currently can't do what you're asking, which sucks. The whole > > ForTypesThatDeriveFrom and Overrides behavior is fundamentally flawed and > > we're planning on sorting the whole deal out post 1.0; I'm going to have > a > > think and see if I can't come up with something for the time being. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Greg Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm wondering if there isn't a better way to 'marking' a field as > > > "Persistable" using an Attribute for example.I hate having hidden > meanings > > > in the names of my fields/properties. > > > > > In your convention you could ignore any property/field that does not > have > > > the "Persistable" attribute on it... > > > It would be more intent revealing and obvious versus having a 'Fld' as > a > > > descriminator... > > > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Kasper22 <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > >> Hi, > > > > >> I was wondering if there is a way to do a blanket ignore property > > >> using auto mapping and conventions? I've found I can ignore > > >> properties on one class with ForTypesThatDeriveFrom<> method, but I > > >> would like to set up a more general rule. Basically, if a property > > >> doesn't start with "Fld" I don't want to map it. > > > > >> Is something like that possible? > > > > >> Thanks, > > >> Bryan > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
