Congratulations, you're the first person to request this feature! ;) You're correct, union-subclass isn't supported. Unfortunately we're on a feature freeze for 1.0 aswell, so it won't be implemented in the near future. Once 1.0 is out we'll start reevaluating new features.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:05 PM, geekedout <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am working on a project where we have a number of classes that are > composed of information from more than one table. Rather than follow > the class-per-table pattern, I would like to map the necessary > information from the required tables into one of these composite > objects. > > I see it can be done with NHibernate using a "union-subclass" > mapping. From what I can tell, this is not supported with FNH. I was > hoping someone could confirm this for me or point me in the right > direction. Since our db is 3NF and we have little control over it, I > see a lot of unions on the horizon for me. > > Thanks, > > Nick > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
