Thanks it works without the patch. Now I just have to clean up my fork, because I was pushing my master branch…argghhr…not a best practice, I guess?…I think I will start a new thread on this…:-)
_____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of James Gregory Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 5:24 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [fluent-nhib] Re: medium trust An unrelated change has had the side-effect of removing the default conventions... so no patch required! On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Morten Maxild <[email protected]> wrote: Fine:-) As a side note on running NH with FNH in medium trust: To disable the reflection-optimizer (necessary under medium trust) one _has_ to use app config. The fluent config API with its ‘DoNot.UseReflectionOptimizer’ is of no use here:-(. This only happens under medium trust, and the reason is this. When the Environment in NH is initialized different infrastructure components are querying the bytecode-provider and reflection-optimizer settings, and the system properties (as opposed to the session-factory properties) are read from app config in the static Environment ctor. This happens very early (before FNH has a chance to set its properties). Therefore under medium trust one has to use app config (even though NH’s Configure() method isn’t used) to prevent ‘tuplizers’ in NH from using the reflection-optimizer, because this will throw. Don not rely on ‘DoNot.UseReflectionOptimizer’ under medium trust. This is just a warning to everyone running medium trust web apps and trying to get rid of the app/web config NH section handler. Regards maxild _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of James Gregory Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 2:17 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [fluent-nhib] Re: medium trust Now that the list is considerably reduced, as you said, it is probably quite reasonable to apply this. I hope to remove the concept of the default conventions all together, but I'm not sure if we can manage that before 1.0. On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:40 PM, maxild <[email protected]> wrote: Hi, I saw some mention of 'issue 200' (http://code.google.com/p/fluent- <http://code.google.com/p/fluent-%0d%0anhibernate/issues/detail?id=200> nhibernate/issues/detail?id=200) when reading tons of mail. I just wanted to say that I have updated the patch. It can be seen here http://github.com/maxild/fluent-nhibernate/commit/f3b061bad9199b26e14cd810093f206fb33d4259 I also noticed that the number of registered conventions had been drastically lowered --- this makes the commit/patch even simpler. It would be nice to have the patch applied. Sry for not being quicker to respond...have been away and ill for some time regards maxild On Aug 13, 8:59 pm, Jorgas <[email protected]> wrote: > On the same subject... > > What I ended up doing was that I am still using FluentNHibernate for > mapping using c# mapping files. And from those I generate *.hbm files > that I include in my project as embedded resources. And instead of > configuring NHibernate in my running application using > Fluently.Configure I configure my NHibernate parts using NHibernates > own configuration methods, adding the mappings from the embedded *.hbm > files instead. This makes the whole thing works inmediumtrustas > well. > > I did run into one problem though... It seems as Lazy Loading doesn't > play nice together withmediumtrustenvironments either, so I skipped > lazy loading (doesn't matter that much for me at this point any way). > But setting Not.LazyLoad() inside the .SubClass() method of the > DiscriminateSubClassesOnColumn<T> method doesn't seem to render the > lazy="false" attribute of the <subclass> element in the generated > *.hbm file. Is this a known behavior? > > Regards, Jörgen > > On Aug 12, 10:25 pm, James Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > > What stopped you from applying Mick's patch? What exactly is preventing you > > from running FNH undermediumtrust? People who have this issue seem to drop > > in, say "it doesn't work inmediumtrust", and then never come back. Makes > > it very difficult to pin it down. > > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Jorgas <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > Hi James. > > > > Any idea on when there will be a supported release from you guys where > > > this is addressed and working? > > > > I could not apply the patch supplied by Mick Delaney, is there a > > > version in the repository that has got it applied? > > > > Is there any other way of getting FluentNHibernate to work under > > >mediumtrust, short of installing it in the GAC? I'm not convinced my > > > ISP will allow that. > > > > Regards, Jörgen > > > > On 31 Juli, 19:05, James Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Unfortunately that's still the case. Does the same fix work for you? > > > > For 1.0 we're drastically reducing the number of internal conventions, > > > > so > > > we > > > > may be able to remedy this on release. > > > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Michael Delaney <[email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > is FNH usable undermediumtrust. there seems to be an open issue > > > > > here: > > > > > >http://code.google.com/p/fluent-nhibernate/issues/detail?id=200 > > > > > > i'm having the exact same problem. > > > > > > cheers.- Dölj citerad text - > > > > > - Visa citerad text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
