It'll have to be new, because the majority of them are properties in the base class and methods in the sub class. Sure somebody'll apply it, but not for a month. Development is on hold until I return from my holidays, only bugfixes are being done.
2009/8/31 Asbjørn Ulsberg <[email protected]> > > On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 22:58:39 +0200, James Gregory > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Is there a reason the base class is not marked as virtual or the new > >> keyword is not used on the subclass? > > > > No reason. > > So if someone patches this up all over with either "virtual" (preferably, > I guess) or "new", you might merge it into the master branch at some > point? :) > > -- > Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- [email protected] > «He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away» > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
