Ok, I think I did it...
I created an attribute called "RelationParent"...that attribute I can
put on any side of the relationship, on its property:
[Cascade(CascadeStyle.Delete)]
[RelationParent]
public virtual ISet<User> Users
{
get
{
return _users ?? (_users = new HashedSet<User>());
}
set
{
_users = value;
}
}
private ISet<User> _users;
Then I created a ManyToManyTableNameConvention which has code like
this:
if (otherSide.Member.HasAttribute<RelationParentAttribute>
())
{
return Inflector.Net.Inflector.Pluralize
(otherSide.EntityType.Name)
+ Inflector.Net.Inflector.Pluralize
(collection.EntityType.Name);
}
return Inflector.Net.Inflector.Pluralize
(collection.EntityType.Name)
+ Inflector.Net.Inflector.Pluralize
(otherSide.EntityType.Name);
This way I can easily overwrite the behavior of automapping or simply
be very specific as to how it will understand the relationship.
Do you think that this is ok? Seems so far?
Thanks!
Vladan
On 4 pro, 20:01, Vladan Strigo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok, thnx for the answer...Ill try it out, to get a full grip on it,
> Ill contact you if I cannot ;)
>
> Thnx again!
>
> Vladan
>
> On 4 pro, 00:16, James Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Rules are: If any table name is set in a convention or manually in the
> > mapping on either side of the relationship, that name is used,
> > otherwise the first mapping that FNH picks up will be considered the
> > parent, and the other side the child.
>
> > If you want to control this naming, setup an automapping override for
> > one side of the relationship and specify the table name for the
> > HasManyToMany.
>
> > On 12/3/09, Vladan Strigo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I've been able to setup Automapping to map my many-to-manys great. It
> > > works like a charm. :)
>
> > > However, I have a question...how does FNH decide when automapping
> > > which table will it put as a Parent table (first in relation) and
> > > which as Child table (second in relation)...
>
> > > Example...how does it decide that it will be ProductsToCustomers,
> > > instead of CustomersToProducts?!
>
> > > Can this be changed (convention/override/attribute on class or
> > > something)?
>
> > > Thanks!
>
> > > Vladan
>
> > > --
>
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > > "Fluent NHibernate" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected].
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en.
