Git does take a while to get used to, but is amazingly powerful once you do.

I look forward to hearing whether my sample helped you at all.

Paul

2010/1/17 Robert Eberhart <[email protected]>

> Thanks.  I'm going to take a look at it...Downloaded GitExtensions,
> which I have been meaning to do anyway.  I use SubVersion, but all the
> cool kids seem to be moving to Git, so I'll give it a try. :-)
>
> 2010/1/16 Paul Batum <[email protected]>:
> > Hi Robert,
> > The self referencing nature is not the issue. If you're prepared to spend
> > any more time on it, I've uploaded a very basic example project. Perhaps
> it
> > will help you troubleshoot:
> >
> http://github.com/paulbatum/Fluent-NH-Test-Bed/tree/self-referencing-many-to-many
> > There is a download source link if you just want a zip and don't want to
> > fool around with git.
> > Paul.
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 1:44 AM, TheNephalim <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Still a "No go."
> >>
> >> Theoretically, it should work, but I think that the issue is that the
> >> items that are composing the many-to-many relationship are of the same
> >> type.  If, for example, I had a separate entity called Sponsor with
> >> its own data and linked the Sponsors to the Users in the UserSponsor
> >> table, I have almost no doubt in my mind that what you are proposing
> >> would work.  However, both keys in the UserSponsor table point back to
> >> the same table and I think that that is what's throwing this whole
> >> thing off.
> >>
> >> According to Mr. Gregory in some of his blog posts (at least I think
> >> that it was him) and the documentation for NHibernate, true many-to-
> >> many relationships are supposed to be rare and can actually be broken
> >> down to a many-to-one - one-to-many scenario.
> >>
> >> I wish that the many-to-many scenario would have worked because it
> >> would have reduced the size of the objects being pulled back.
> >>
> >> Again, I really do appreciate you taking the time to assist me in this
> >> endeavor; it has been very educational.
> >>
> >> -Robert Eberhart
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >> "Fluent NHibernate" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> .
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected]<fluent-nhibernate%[email protected]>
> .
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Fluent NHibernate" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<fluent-nhibernate%[email protected]>
> .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en.
> >
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Fluent NHibernate" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<fluent-nhibernate%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en.
>
>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en.

Reply via email to