I just checked both classes (in the following links) and nothing of that
have been added.

http://github.com/jagregory/fluent-nhibernate/blob/master/src/FluentNHibernate/Cfg/FluentMappingsContainer.cs
http://github.com/jagregory/fluent-nhibernate/blob/master/src/FluentNHibernate/Mapping/ClassMap.cs

Regards,
DM

2010/3/15 snicker <ngordon...@gmail.com>

> I'm quite confused. Your suggestions exist in the latest revisions of
> the repository. If you check out the repo and build from source you'll
> have exactly what you wish for.
>
> On Mar 14, 5:27 pm, "Mira.D" <mirapalh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >   Hi,
> >
> >   Just like I told in another post (http://groups.google.com/group/
> > fluent-nhibernate/t/9eb53f6447e9771a) I use to set some dynamic
> > filters on my entities. Actually I have to do a very ugly workaround
> > so I can acomplish that, for the definitions I have to emit code to
> > make the FilterDefinitions inherited classes and for the mapping
> > classes I have to set a static property with the filters witch it has
> > to Apply (when just it needs is the filter name). I think it should be
> > very better if you could add two more overloads in the
> > ClassMap<T>.ApplyFilter method, those should be:
> >
> >         public ClassMap<T> ApplyFilter(string name)
> >         {
> >             return this.ApplyFilter(name, null);
> >         }
> >         public ClassMap<T> ApplyFilter(string name, string condition)
> >         {
> >             var part = new FilterPart(new TFilter().Name, condition);
> >             filters.Add(part);
> >             return this;
> >         }
> >
> >   And the current one could be changed to:
> >
> >         public ClassMap<T> ApplyFilter<TFilter>(string condition)
> > where TFilter : FilterDefinition, new()
> >         {
> >             return this.ApplyFilter(new TFilter().Name, condition);
> >         }
> >
> >   That should solve part of my problem, second I would have the
> > FluentMappingsContainer.Add restricting me to add just types and
> > forcing me to emit code for the filter definitions as, also, set
> > static properties of my entities mapping classes so they know witch
> > filters should they apply when I could just instantiated then, set the
> > filters on then an pass this instance to the
> > FluentMappingsContainer.Add.
> >
> >   Would be something like:
> >
> >     public class FluentMappingsContainer
> >     {
> >         private readonly IList<IMappingProvider> mappings = new
> > List<IMappingProvider>();
> >         private readonly IList<IFilterDefinition> filters = new
> > List<IFilterDefinition>();
> >         ...
> >         public FluentMappingsContainer Add(IMappingProvider mapping)
> >         {
> >             mappings.Add(mapping);
> >             WasUsed = true;
> >             return this;
> >         }
> >         public FluentMappingsContainer Add(IFilterDefinition filter)
> >         {
> >             filters.Add(filters);
> >             WasUsed = true;
> >             return this;
> >         }
> >         internal void Apply(Configuration cfg)
> >         {
> >             foreach (var mapping in mappings)
> >             {
> >                 model.Add(mapping);
> >             }
> >
> >             foreach (var filter in filters)
> >             {
> >                 model.Add(filter);
> >             }
> >
> >             foreach (var assembly in assemblies)
> >             {
> >                 model.AddMappingsFromAssembly(assembly);
> >             }
> >
> >             foreach (var type in types)
> >             {
> >                 model.Add(type);
> >             }
> >
> >             if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(exportPath))
> >                 model.WriteMappingsTo(exportPath);
> >
> >             model.Configure(cfg);
> >         }
> >
> >   I have posted this last year (http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-
> > nhibernate/browse_thread/thread/fdc23fd8197d9bbc/
> > 743077793216c027#743077793216c027) but got nothing, to my happiness I
> > haven't to change fluentnh code that time as in that case was for
> > dicriminating classes witch have it's behavior changed to use
> > SubclassMap<T>. I'm not posting a real case because the code is long
> > and uggly and I don't see that those overloads should be a major
> > change in the FluentNHibernate structure (enlighten me if I'm wrong),
> > all those code have been tested here and worked fine I just don't use
> > them because if I make a change on FluentNHibernate I'll have to peek
> > it on every new version I download, too messy, error prone,
> > whatever...
> >
> >   Best Regards,
> >   DM
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Fluent NHibernate" group.
> To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibern...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> fluent-nhibernate+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<fluent-nhibernate%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
Daniel Mirapalheta

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibern...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
fluent-nhibernate+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en.

Reply via email to