It doesn't, but it's quite easy to make it work.
In AutoMapper source code in method MapInheritanceTree, just before if
(!isDiscriminated) add
var tempMapping = mapping as ClassMapping;
if(tempMapping != null && tempMapping.IsUnionSubclass)
{
subclassMapping = new SubclassMapping(SubclassType.UnionSubclass)
{
Type = inheritedClass.Type
};
}
else if
it will generate union-subclasses mappings, you can test it with:
[TestFixture]
public class UnionSubclassConventionTests
{
[Test]
public void DefaultConventionsAreAppliedToUnionSubClasses()
{
new AutoMappingTester<SuperType>(
AutoMap.AssemblyOf<SuperType>()
.Where(x => x.Namespace ==
typeof(SuperType).Namespace)
.Override<SuperType>(m =>
m.UseUnionSubclassForInheritanceMapping()))
.Element("class/union-subclass").Exists();
}
}
not sure if more tests should be written.
Cheers,
Jakub G
On May 3, 2:45 pm, lbargaoanu <lbargao...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does UseUnionSubclassForInheritanceMapping work with the AutoMapper?
> Because I use an override and call it and I still get JoinedSubclass.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
fluent-nhibernate+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en.
