On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 19:18 +0200, Miguel Lobo wrote:
>
> I actually knew that. On the other hand, many of those OSes won't be
> able to use Fluidsynth as long as it lacks an audio driver compatible
> with them. Fluidsynth has a Windows audio driver. Does it have one
> for Solaris? No? Then what use is a build system that supports
> Solaris?
>
Well OSS supports Solaris, which means, yes! MSVC likely won't run on
my ARM 9 based embedded system, but gcc sure the hell will ;) The
discussion is all a bit off topic now I think. As I've said before,
this may indeed turn out to not be a fork, if it seems to make sense to
go that direction in making FluidSynth natively C++. I've been kicking
around the thought of doing a GObject re-code of it just for the hell of
it. It probably wouldn't take that long, and something like GOB might
help. That would at least give us all a better idea what would be the
best long term solution.
> C++'s features are useful precisely because they can't be simulated in
> C that easily. But anyway, I won't be doing that translation; good
> luck to those who will.
>
Not sure any such translation is needed, unless you mean writing a C
binding for the C++ re-work.
>
> Regards,
> Miguel
>
Regards,
Josh
_______________________________________________
fluid-dev mailing list
fluid-dev@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
