On Jan 3, 2010, at 10:44 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Quoting Graham Goode <[email protected]>:
Hi Guys,
This is not for the 1.1.1 RC release, but perhaps more a question for
1.2 or 2.0...
Will fluidsynth use the LV2 audio plugin standard? (LV2 is a simple
but extensible successor of LADSPA - http://lv2plug.in/). The popular
swh-plugins set is available in LV2 and has some great chorus and
reverb options...
Thanks for all that you guys are doing!
Graham
Seems like a good idea to me. It would be an optional build time
dependency like LADSPA is currently. I recently tested FluidSynth
LADSPA support and didn't experience any issues. I know it had some
crash problems in the past, but this was never investigated. Has
anyone tried FluidSynth LADSPA support recently? Anyone willing to
give it a try? I suspect that the crash issue is related to
architecture or something else. I looked over the code a bit and
didn't see anything obvious. Its a bit difficult to fix a problem
that can't be reproduced! Perhaps some of the recent thread safety
changes fixed whatever issue was there.
Hello all
I had originally broached this topic about a year ago, but after some
consideration I think that it would be better to develop fluidsynth
itself as a lv2 plug-in. This would enable users to use fluidsynth as
a plug-in into programs like Rosegarden and Ardour.
As for using FX in fluidsynth there are three possibilities:
1. As Josh has mentioned the LADSPA route could be worthy of renewed
testing
2. Channel the fluidsynth signal via Jack-rack
3. When used with a sequencer, the fluidsynth signal could be routed
through the sequencer's effects plug-ins.
Other thoughts and opinions requested.
HAPPY NEW YEAR ALL!
Ebrahim.
_______________________________________________
fluid-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
