On Sunday, June 20, 2010, David Henningsson wrote: > To get to know the voice code better, I've done some refactoring which > is already in trunk. And as the number of source files increase, so does > the need for subdirectories. Any objections to me organizing the source > files in subdirectories?
There is an alternative CMake build system in trunk, added in SVN revision #287 (3 months ago). See also ticket #38, http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/fluidsynth/ticket/38 I've announced it on this list, and asked for comments and testing. Nobody answered, reported problems or success. Today, it is not possible to compile FluidSynth using this new build system, because there are source files that weren't included in src/CMakeLists.txt, a file with a simple syntax not very different from src/Makefile.am that has been updated. I think that there are advantages in using CMake (see README.cmake) but if nobody else supports it except me, it would be a waste to keep and maintain it. I don't have any objection about organizing the source files in subdirectories, but that would require keeping in sync both build systems. If you are not interested, please feel free to remove the files added in revision #287 and close the ticket #38. Regards, Pedro _______________________________________________ fluid-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
