On Nov 8, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
The curses based "ccmake" is fine, too. But I wonder that you are
using a top class graphical system, Mac OSX, and at the same time
you prefer a terminal based tool instead of the modern cmake-gui,
much more in the line of your favorite operating system.
Pedro
I was too busy yesterday to properly reply to your message. There are
a couple of points from this message that need to be clarified.
In reply to your comment above: We all have our preferred ways of
working and there is absolutely nothing wrong working with the command-
line. FluidSynth ia a command-line application, it works and I love it!
Maybe this is because you are using a fink package, and they only
provide a crippled CMake where cmake-gui has been amputated.
Such snide comments are destructive for harmoniously working together.
Well, you can ditch this fink package out of your nest, or move "/
sw" to the latest and darkest position in your system path
I am very happy with my system path as it is.
because there is a complete, fine and native universal CMake package
coming directly from their creators.
http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/cmake-2.8.3-Darwin-universal.dmg
Good.
Other source and binary packages are available here
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/resources/software.html
Sorry for the rant.
You should be.... keep your comments to the point. I respect your
preferences and you should mine.
Diverse approaches to getting the work done are healthy. I hope you
are okay with this ?
Ebrahim
_______________________________________________
fluid-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
