Hi Eli, Interesting problem...
On 11-May-08, at 10:15 AM, Eli Cochran wrote: > There is some code in Progress that does some tweaking to the format > of the Progress dialog. There is a comment there now that the code > should be moved to CSS. The reason the code is there is to make up > for problems in CSS. > > Specifically that the opacity setting is browser specific. We can > put it in CSS (and many people do) but then the CSS file will not > validate, so when dealing with CSS, I usually let jQuery deal with > it and handle the browser foo. The general idea we were trying to encourage was that any appearance- related settings are ideally expressed in CSS. Your point is that opacity is specified in different ways depending on the browser. What a drag! So it seems like we have two possible options: 1. Expose opacity as a optional parameter in the JavaScript 2. Specify opacity value within the CSS in the W3C format but continue to use jQuery to actually set the value Any recommendations? Colin --- Colin Clark Technical Lead, Fluid Project Adaptive Technology Resource Centre, University of Toronto http://fluidproject.org _______________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list [email protected] http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
