Yes, we can certainly add the Content Management Research stuff. You
can either put them in yourself, or let me know which pages you want to
include and I'll add them. I still feel that the annotations in the ToC
need polishing, and I may want to change the order of some of the
sub-sections, so I'll be continuing to work on it for a while.
Regards,
Paul
Allison Bloodworth wrote:
Wow, Paul, this is fantastic! Thank you so much for your work on this.
It's very gratifying to be able to see at a glance all the amazing
resources we've all put together! :)
One other section I *believe* we will want to link to is Content
Management
Research: http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Content+Management+Research.
I don't think we'll want to link to all the sub-pages (as some of them
are incomplete), but I think we are ready to share out the info-packed
Content Management Research Models
page: http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Content+Management+Research+Models
f information on personas and use cases. I'll talk to Daphne on Monday
(or maybe even this weekend) about exactly what pages we'd like to
link to and get back to you (or just tag and add them to the table of
contents myself) asap so that we can get it into the release.
<http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Content+Management+Research+Models>
<http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Content+Management+Research+Models>
Thanks again,
<http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Content+Management+Research+Models>
Allison
<http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Content+Management+Research+Models>
<http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Content+Management+Research+Models>
On May 29, 2008, at 4:37 PM, Paul Zablosky wrote:
<http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Content+Management+Research+Models>
<http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Content+Management+Research+Models>
<http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Content+Management+Research+Models>
I have created an initial version of a table of contents for the
Fluid release manual at
<http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Content+Management+Research+Models>http://wiki.fluidproject.org/x/VAAs.
It can also be found through the link User Manual ToC
<http://wiki.fluidproject.org/x/VAAs> at the top of the left-side
navigation bar in the Fluid wiki. All the pages referenced in the
ToC have been assigned the label manual them. They include all the
pages labeled "release" in the 0.3beta.
The idea was to create an organized table of contents with distinct
sections, supplemented by annotations to assist the reader in
understanding which pages contain what kind of content. Right now,
the annotations are simplistic and incomplete, and some of the
sections could do with reordering, but it's a start.
I invite comments and suggestions. Does this seem like a useful
approach, now that we have an example? Are there things I could do
to make the page and its contents more coherent and useful?
Paul
_______________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
Allison Bloodworth
Senior User Interaction Designer
Educational Technology Services
University of California, Berkeley
(415) 377-8243
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list
[email protected]
http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
