The reason that we went with this scheme was to be more consistent
with the fl- namespace set up by the new skinning system.
- Eli
On Dec 12, 2008, at 2:21 PM, Anastasia Cheetham wrote:
I've reviewed these css changes, and commented on the JIRA, but
since it's late and most people won't necessarily be tracking the
JIRAs, I've reproduced my comments below:
I'm seeing some inconsistency in naming of styles for components.
The uploader styles all start with "fl-uploader-" i.e. "fl-"
followed by the component name (see fluid.components.uploader.css).
But other components use style names that start with the component
name i.e. there is no "fl-" prefix (e.g. "ui_options_container" and
"ui-dialog" and "inlineEdit-invitation" and "orderable-*")
Should we decide on a convention and stick to it, or was there a
reason for the existing scheme?
--
Anastasia Cheetham [email protected]
Software Designer, Fluid Project http://fluidproject.org
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre / University of Toronto
_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
Eli Cochran
user interaction developer
ETS, UC Berkeley
_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
