On 18-Dec-08, at 10:50 AM, Jonathan Hung wrote:
I would like
to bring up the opportunity for us to use more of the "Infusion" name.
"In the header of the file, link to the Javascript files with
<script> tags:
<script type="text/javascript"
src="fluid-0.6/fluid-components/js/Fluid-all.js"></script>"
In situations like this, I think we should be using "infusion-0.6".
Jon, these are good thoughts. I agree that we should try to do a
better job of referring to the Infusion bundle as Infusion, and not as
Fluid. Page headers, etc. can easily be updated to include Infusion
where appropriate.
The example you gave is a sample folder name, and was selected because
currently, our zipped release bundles do extract to a folder with the
'fluid' name and not 'infusion'. Do we want to consider changing the
actual name of the bundle files to 'infusion-0.6.zip' instead of
'fluid-0.6.zip'? What about the Fluid-all.js file name?
Good questions...
--
Anastasia Cheetham [email protected]
Software Designer, Fluid Project http://fluidproject.org
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre / University of Toronto
_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
