Or perhaps "Needs Review" or "Requires Review" if it is required.
- Eli On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Justin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > You may have mentioned this in one of your other e-mails about the OSDPL but > could you please remind me when the "Not reviewed" means. It would seem that > "Draft", "Open for Comments", and "Ready for Review" are all in a state of > not having been reviewed. > > Thanks > Justin > On 23-Jan-09, at 10:06 AM, Jonathan Hung wrote: > >> Hi everyone. >> >> I'm continuing work on the design pattern workflow on the OSDPL. So >> far a design pattern can take any of the following states: >> >> - Draft >> - Open for Comments >> - Ready for Review >> - Published >> - Reviewed >> - Not reviewed** >> >> I'm trying to think of a succinct icon that describes each state, but >> I can't think of anything appropriate. Anyone care to make >> suggestions? >> >> Also the phrase "not reviewed" feels awkward. Anyone suggest a better >> phrase or term to describe content that has not been reviewed by an >> editor? >> >> Thanks! >> >> - Jonathan. >> >> --- >> Jonathan Hung / [email protected] >> Fluid Project - ATRC at University of Toronto >> Tel: (416) 946-3002 >> _______________________________________________________ >> fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] >> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, >> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work > > _______________________________________________________ > fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, > see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work > _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
